Skip to main content

The time of earthquakes is at hand

Now - October 2008 - is the 75th anniversary of the publication of the first surrealist poem in English, written by David Gascoyne. On the October eve (more or less) of "National Poetry Day" next week it seemed a good time to mention this.

Comments

Alistair Noon said…
Hi Todd

David Gascoyne had at least several very worthwhile poems I think. The programmatically Surrealist poems are not some mess from the subconscious but arrangements of imagery as clear as in any more realist poem. “Salvador Dali”, for example – OK, the title announces loudly where it’s coming from – has the sharp contours of Dali’s paintings. It begins:

The face of the precipice is black with lovers;
The sun above them is a bag of nails…

I’m a bit put off by the late Romantic poet-as-visionary Latinate/abstract style of quite a lot of Gascoyne. But beside the Surrealist stuff, he also wrote a number of poems that really get everything working to say something about (at least) the time they were written in, such as this one, datelined Christmas 1938:

Snow in Europe


Out of their slumber Europeans spun
Dense dreams: appeasement, miracle, glimpsed flash
Of a new golden era; but could not restrain
The vertical white weight that fell last night
And made their continent a blank.

Hush, says the sameness of the snow,
The Ural and Jura now rejoin
The furthest Arctic's desolation. All is one;
Sheer monotone: plain, mountain; country, town:
Contours and boundaries no longer show.

The warring flags hang colourless a while;
Now midnight's icy zero feigns a truce
Between the signs and seasons, and fades out
All shots and cries. But when the great thaw comes,
How red shall be the melting snow, how loud the drums!


Cheers
Alistair
EYEWEAR said…
Alistair, thanks for this.

I'm curious - what is it about the late Romantic - and abstract - style you mention, that puts you off? I'm genuinely interested in this issue, since I think this taste/style issue helps to keep readers away from the later modernist poetry of the period (of the Forties); is it partly due to the lack of Pound's imagistic clarity?
Steven Waling said…
This is just my opinion - it's not scholarly or anything - but I think there's something about the British that resists things that sound over the top. I remember myself reading a blurb for a Joy Harjo book that went something like "This is not poetry, it is a journey into womanspeak," and putting the book back in the shelf in disgust. It seemed overblown somehow.

Some of the '40's poets can seem a bit like that - Mervyn Peake could go over the top for instance - and it makes it harder to see the ironies and distances put into the verse. There's a line from Nicholas Moore - "Shall I make my disasters clear?" which sounds like it's about to get all pompous and high falutin' in a rather bathetic way. It never does, but it sails pretty close to the wind.

I think, though, we have a tendency to go too far in the other direction - toward a plainness of style that can be terribly non-commital. There's something much more commited about a Gascoyne poem or a Moore poem that rubs up against that terribly English empiricist cynicism were all supposed to espouse.

Popular posts from this blog

CLIVE WILMER'S THOM GUNN SELECTED POEMS IS A MUST-READ

THAT HANDSOME MAN  A PERSONAL BRIEF REVIEW BY TODD SWIFT I could lie and claim Larkin, Yeats , or Dylan Thomas most excited me as a young poet, or even Pound or FT Prince - but the truth be told, it was Thom Gunn I first and most loved when I was young. Precisely, I fell in love with his first two collections, written under a formalist, Elizabethan ( Fulke Greville mainly), Yvor Winters triad of influences - uniquely fused with an interest in homerotica, pop culture ( Brando, Elvis , motorcycles). His best poem 'On The Move' is oddly presented here without the quote that began it usually - Man, you gotta go - which I loved. Gunn was - and remains - so thrilling, to me at least, because so odd. His elegance, poise, and intelligence is all about display, about surface - but the surface of a panther, who ripples with strength beneath the skin. With Gunn, you dressed to have sex. Or so I thought.  Because I was queer (I maintain the right to lay claim to that

IQ AND THE POETS - ARE YOU SMART?

When you open your mouth to speak, are you smart?  A funny question from a great song, but also, a good one, when it comes to poets, and poetry. We tend to have a very ambiguous view of intelligence in poetry, one that I'd say is dysfunctional.  Basically, it goes like this: once you are safely dead, it no longer matters how smart you were.  For instance, Auden was smarter than Yeats , but most would still say Yeats is the finer poet; Eliot is clearly highly intelligent, but how much of Larkin 's work required a high IQ?  Meanwhile, poets while alive tend to be celebrated if they are deemed intelligent: Anne Carson, Geoffrey Hill , and Jorie Graham , are all, clearly, very intelligent people, aside from their work as poets.  But who reads Marianne Moore now, or Robert Lowell , smart poets? Or, Pound ?  How smart could Pound be with his madcap views? Less intelligent poets are often more popular.  John Betjeman was not a very smart poet, per se.  What do I mean by smart?

"I have crossed oceans of time to find you..."

In terms of great films about, and of, love, we have Vertigo, In The Mood for Love , and Casablanca , Doctor Zhivago , An Officer and a Gentleman , at the apex; as well as odder, more troubling versions, such as Sophie's Choice and  Silence of the Lambs .  I think my favourite remains Bram Stoker's Dracula , with the great immortal line "I have crossed oceans of time to find you...".